Wednesday 26 June 2013

Bill Gross Thoughts on Chairman Bernanke's plan to begin to taper bond purchases

By William H. Gross

 At his press conference last week, Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke said the central bank may begin to taper the monetary stimulus by tapering its asset purchases later this year and ending them in 2014.
We agree that QE must end. It has distorted incentives and inflated asset prices to artificial levels. But we think the Fed’s plan may be too hasty.
Fog may be obscuring the Fed’s view of the economy—in particular, the structural impediments that will inhibit its ability to achieve higher growth and inflation. Bernanke said the Fed expects the unemployment rate to fall to about 7% by the middle of next year. However, we think this is a long shot.
Bernanke’s remarks indicated that the Fed is taking a cyclical view of the economy. He blamed lower growth on fiscal austerity, for example, suggesting that should it be removed from the equation the economy would suddenly be growing at 3%. He similarly attributed rising housing prices to homeowners who simply like or anticipate higher home prices, as opposed to emphasizing the mortgage rate, which is really what provided the lift in the first place.
Our view of the economy places greater emphasis on structural factors. Wages continue to be dampened by globalization. Demographic trends, notably the aging of our society and the retirement of the Baby Boomers, will lead to a lower level of consumer demand. And then there’s the race against the machine; technology continues to eliminate jobs as opposed to provide them.
Bernanke made no mention of these factors, which we think are significant forces that will prevent unemployment from reaching the 7% threshold during the next year. Falling below  5% and 6% is an even more distant goal.
 Bernanke said the Fed sees inflation progressing toward its 2% objective “over time.” At the moment, we’re nowhere near that.
The Fed’s plan strikes us as a bit ironic, in fact, because Bernanke has long-standing and deep concerns about deflation. We’ve witnessed this in speeches going back five or 10 years—the “helicopter speech,” the references not only to the Depression but to the lost decades in Japan. He badly wants to avoid the mistake of premature tightening, as occurred disastrously in the 1930s. Indeed, on several occasions during his press conference, Bernanke conditioned his expectations of tapering on inflation moving back toward the Fed’s 2% objective.
We’re in a highly levered economy where households can’t afford to pay much more in interest expense. Monthly payments for a 30-year mortgage have jumped 20% to 25% since January. Mortgage originations have plummeted by 39% since early May.
High levels of leverage, both here and abroad, have made the global economy far more sensitive to interest rates. Whereas a decade or two ago the Fed could raise the fed funds rate by 500 basis points and expect the economy to slow, today if the Fed were to hike rates or taper suddenly, the economy couldn’t handle it.
It’s reasonable, of course, for Bernanke to try to prepare markets for the inevitable and necessary wind down of QE.But if he has to step back,the trust of markets and dampened volatility that has driven markets over the past two or three years could probably never be fully regained. 

From the WSJ. Sharp increases in long-term rates would affect US Economic recovery



Sharp increases in long-term interest rates, triggered by  Chairman Bernanke statements, threaten sales of homes, cars and other big-ticket items that have helped drive the U.S. economic recovery.
The U.S. economy grew at a 1.8% annualized rate in the first quarter this year after barely growing in the fourth quarter of 2012, . An important part of the growth was produced by spending on big-ticket consumer goods and home construction, both sensitive to interest rates. Taking away those two sectors, the economy grew at an anemic 0.9% in the first quarter and contracted in the final three months of 2012.
Higher rates reduce the appeal of mortgage refinancing, which helps households lower monthly payments. The Mortgage Bankers Association said Wednesday that applications to refinance mortgages decreased last week to their lowest level since November 2011.

Correction in bond prices, the Story Beforehand Told.

Excerpts of J.J Zhang article Bond bull is over and your choices are not pretty.Marketwatch
  
    The start of the  Fed´s tappering of the bond purchases on the following months, has brought
a sharp correction in the prices of bonds all around the world,and this will have an impact on the
wealth of many households. The smooth ending(or not) sooner or later of the accomodative monetary 
policies,  will bring a deep correction in the bond prices. There will be high volatility in this market,if the 
Fed steps back in,and return to ease money, there will be a pause.
   The longer the period with easy money,the deeper the mis allocation of resources,the  greater
the correction of these distortions.

"Allocating a significant portion of your assets to bonds, particularly U.S. Treasurys, and other stable income-based assets is one of the modern investing and portfolio(safe) practices.

There are reasons and times when bonds are a good idea and essential for balancing equity risks, but that time is not today.
 The 30-year bull market in bonds is almost over, if not already, and holding run-of-the-mill bonds today, particularly U.S. Treasurys, is a potential disaster in the making.
 In theory, bonds are very stable (barring bankruptcy), you pay a fixed par amount, you get regular interest payments and you eventually get your principle back at the end.

While this is true, this is not what normally happens for small investors today.
A careful distinction is that the vast majority of people are buying bond funds, not the actual underlying bonds. Like stock mutual funds or stock ETFs, bond funds are comprised of a large number of assets, in this case bonds, at varying maturities and types. When you buy a bond fund, you are buying a share of those assets.
While bonds have a set par or face value, they can trade at a premium or discount to it. As interest rates and yields change, because the yearly interest payment on a bond is fixed, the bond price has to adjust to make the bond competitive with new issues",(so it changes daily in a secondary market).

 The bonds are quoted at below, equal or above nominal face value. If you sell an investment in a
ETF of Bonds, or in a Mutual Fund of Bonds, part of the investment is going to be liquidated at
prices below face value and no interest gain,making a loss for individual investors, depending
on the average maturity of the bonds. The longer the maturity the greater the loss, the shorter the
maturity the lesser the loss.

President of Richmond Fed,Central Bank is not anywhere near Cutting size of its Balance Sheet

The president of the Richmond Fed, Jeffrey Lacker, said in an interview Wednesday that the market "got a little bit ahead" of the central bank in pricing in tapering of bond purchases. In an interview on Bloomberg Television, Lacker said the central bank is not "anywhere near" cutting the size of its balance sheet. 

Source Marketwatch

Sharp Turn on China's Central bank Policy

China's central bank took a sharp turn Tuesday evening, when it promised to inject money into a temporary liquidity shortage after rejecting banks' pleas for cash over the past two weeks.
The move has been interpreted as regulators' decision to end the credit crunch that caused interbank rates to surge to double digits and pounded the stock market into bearish territory.
The benchmark seven-day fixing repo dipped 78 base points to 7.22 percent as of 11:30 a.m. Wednesday, and the Shanghai Interbank Offered Rate (SHIBOR) overnight rate slid 18 base points to 5.55 percent at the same time. The SHIBOR overnight rate shot up to 25 percent last Thursday, when banks rushed to each other for money.
Another factor forcing the PBOC to dial back its tight liquidity stance was that the market reacted to regulators' call in a way that was the opposite of what regulators had hoped for. In desperate need of cash, banks rolled out massive wealth management products (WMPs) to attract deposits, and the yields of these investments grew much higher than previous ones, thus posing greater risks.
The central bank relented on its stance of a tightened credit crunch, as economists warned that a prolonged credit crunch would put the brakes on the economy, which is already facing mounting downward pressures.
Source:  Xinhua

Robert Mundell thoughts of Current Liquidity Crunch in China

 The current liquidity crunch in the Chinese financial market is not a crisis, but it is still a problem that could hamper economic growth, Nobel Prize-winning economist Robert Mundell said here Tuesday.
Mundell made the remarks when commenting on China's macro- economy on the sidelines of a forum held by the Universal Credit Rating Group (UCRG), a new credit rating firm jointly established by agencies from China, Russia and the United States.
Worries over a liquidity crunch have been raised as short-term interbank rates rocketed to unusually high levels during the past two weeks in China, causing the country's key stock index to dive more than 5 percent on Monday, the biggest daily loss in nearly four years.
However, Mundell warned that if the tight credit continues for a long time, it could lead to a crisis.
The credit crunch was a result of excessive lending in the past three years, as now the banks have to curb it, he said.
He said he was not sure about the credit crunch's impact on the country's economic growth in the second half of this year, but if that crunch continues, it could "definitely lower growth."
But maybe the government is willing to accept a lower growth if it gets enough debt reduced, he added, saying that a slowdown in growth is not an urgent problem for China.

From WSJ quotes of Government Bonds

 Government Bonds                                            Price Change     Yield %                        
U.S. 3 Month-0/320.056
U.S. 2 Year2/320.402
U.S. 5 Year8/321.437
U.S. 10 Year16/322.551
U.S. 30 Year16/323.595
Germany 2 Year2/320.215
Germany 10 Year11/321.769
Italy 2 Year12/322.480
Italy 10 Year1 8/324.705
Japan 2 Year0/320.146
Japan 10 Year0/320.873
Spain 2 Year10/322.332
Spain 10 Year1 20/324.814
U.K. 2 Year5/320.415
U.K. 10 Year22/322.450

Quotes of Precious Metals

Quotes of precious metals futures 3 months:

Gold                       1231.97

Silver                         18.61

From Reuters: Europe's and China Central Banks moves to calm market fears

"World stocks and bonds had a second day of big gains on Wednesday, lifted by healthy U.S. data, moves by China to calm banking sector fears and supportive signals from Europe's central banks.
Markets from safe-haven U.S. Treasuries to riskier stocks and emerging market assets have dropped on worries about the impact of an end to the U.S. Federal Reserve's support program, and as signs emerged of a credit crunch in China.

After both the U.S. and Asia's main share and bond markets had risen overnight, Europe's investors shook off a shaky start to send the FTSEurofirst 300 .The index of top shares up more than 1 percent for a second day running.
Gold and silver, however, both slumped to near three-year lows as investors continued to dump assets used as a safety net in case central bank money printing went wrong or fuelled a spike in inflation.
Markets from safe-haven U.S. Treasuries to riskier stocks and emerging market assets have dropped on worries about the impact of an end to the U.S. Federal Reserve's support program, and as signs emerged of a credit crunch in China".
Bonds had a rebound today ,ease that it is difficult to say is going to last for a long time. Because of the size
of the bond market we could say that lots of volatility and turmoil lies ahead,in the process to adjust portfolios
into a new scenario of higher interest rates,
"As new data showed Europe's economy remains in the doldrums, the region's policymakers were again out in force to try and calm any market jitters.
Both the European Central Bank and Bank of England said on Tuesday that, unlike the Fed, they remained in full support mode.
Bank for International Settlements General Manager Jaime Caruana also told Reuters in an interview the BIS was not demanding immediate action on global exiting and that the timing of an exit had to be determined by each central bank individually.
The annual report from the BIS - known as "the central banks' central bank" - provoked a storm of response at the weekend after saying an exit from accommodative policies would only become harder over time.(See previous post in this Blog)
Draghi's comments helped pushed the euro to a three-week low of $1.3035 against a broadly stronger dollar .DXY and helped trim yields on the peripheral-economy euro zone bonds which have jumped by more than half a percent over recent weeks.
Spanish 10-year yields dropped 16 basis points to 4.88 percent while equivalent Italian yields were 14 bps lower at 4.74 percent".

US Bond Market Size and the Change of its Composition 2008 vs 2011 Source: Learn Bonds

US Bond Market Size

1980 – $2.54 Trillion
1990 – $7.66 Trillion
2000 – $16.96 Trillion
2010 – $36.52 Trillion
2012 (Q2) – $37.46 Trillion

The composition of the bond market since 1980 has also changed substantially.  Since 1980, the popularity of large time deposits (essentially CDs) and commercial paper has declined dramatically, from over 30% of total bond market, to under 10%.
Mortgage related bonds (MBS, CMOs) on the other hand, have increased from under 5% in 1980 to over 20%.

Popular Posts